Up & Coming Weekly

June 18, 2019

Up and Coming Weekly is a weekly publication in Fayetteville, NC and Fort Bragg, NC area offering local news, views, arts, entertainment and community event and business information.

Issue link: http://www.epageflip.net/i/1131550

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 32

WWW.UPANDCOMINGWEEKLY.COM JUNE 19-25, 2019 UCW 5 JOHN HOOD, Chairman of the John Locke Foundation. COMMENTS? Editor@upand- comingweekly.com. 910-484-6200. OPINION e late University of Oklahoma scholar Rufus Fears described freedom as exist- ing at three levels. Individual freedom means the right to do what you choose without the government telling you otherwise. Political freedom means the right to vote and participate in civic affairs. Finally, national freedom means the right of a people collectively not to be ruled by some other people. What does freedom mean to you? by JOHN HOOD I have devoted most of my life to building, inhabiting and sometimes leading organizations devoted to advancing the cause of freedom. But what I mean by that term may be quite different than what you mean. Even if the context is limited only to political matters, most people would agree that "freedom" is an essential public value — and then proceed to disagree about what public policies are required to protect or expand it. e roots of such disagreements run deep. In his seminal work "Albion's Seed," the historian David Hackett Fischer describes four waves of settlement, emanating from four different regions of the British Isles, that helped shape the history and pol- itics of the North American colonies during the 17th and 18th centuries. Each of the four "folkways," as Fischer put it, contained its own conception of freedom. For the Puritans who settled New England from East Anglia and the Netherlands, the organizing principle was "ordered liberty." You were free if you were part of a free, self-governing community. "Public liberty," as the concept was also called, was "thought to be consistent with close restraints upon individuals," Fischer explained. For the Royalists who settled Vir- ginia and neighboring colonies from their original homes in the south of England, the organizing principle was something closer to "hegemonic liberty," in Fischer's phrase. In other words, while they emphasized individual freedom instead of the Puritans' sense of collective liberty, Virginians didn't think everyone was entitled to it. Rank had its privileges, in other words, and obviously, those held in bondage were excluded entirely. Quite different was the "reciprocal liberty" espoused by the Quakers and other religious dis- senters who settled Pennsylvania and its environs. eir conception "embraced all humanity and was written in the Golden Rule." While religious liberty was essential to this tradition, its protection of individual autonomy extended to other spheres of life, as well, including property rights and proce- dural rights for those accused of crimes. Finally, large waves of settlement from Northern Ireland, Scotland and Northern England during the 18th century brought the idea of "natural lib- erty" to the backcountry of early America. Reject- ing the idea of tempering their personal freedom with the communal authority of the Puritans, the hierarchical authority of the Royalists, or the radi- cal egalitarianism of the Quakers, the backcountry folk insisted that they simply wanted to be left alone. Indeed, as a group of Mecklenburg County leaders put it in 1768, their individual liberties came before their political obligations. "We shall ever be ready to support the government under which we find the most liberty," they stated. ese were just the original British folkways that help shaped America's political culture. Weave in the distinc- tive beliefs of America's other origin cultures and you have an ideological tapestry of intricate complexity. e late University of Oklahoma scholar Rufus Fears described free- dom as existing at three levels. Indi- vidual freedom means the right to do what you choose without the govern- ment telling you otherwise. Political freedom means the right to vote and participate in civic affairs. Finally, national freedom means the right of a people collectively not to be ruled by some other people. Ideally, one would enjoy freedom at all levels. But for most of recorded history, most people have enjoyed just one or two of these freedoms, if any. For example, under the Roman empire, quite a few people enjoyed individual freedom and some enjoyed the political freedom to elect local magistrates. But no one outside Rome itself experienced national freedom. To my way of thinking, individual freedom is the end-goal. I value politi- cal freedom and national freedom precisely because I think they are most likely to protect individual freedom from encroachments, foreign or domestic. To be free is not necessarily to be happy. It certainly doesn't make one free of social attachments, or capable of obtaining any particular goal. It simply means you can pursue whatever goal you wish without government tell- ing you otherwise. And I think it's worth fighting for. SPECIAL EDITION Published, Distributed and Online in the Fayetteville, Ft. Bragg and Cumberland County area ALL YEAR! 2019 Best of Fayetteville Special Edition • Coming July 31, 2019 ATTENTION LOCAL BUSINESSES...NEED CUSTOMERS? Advertise & promote your business all year long eectively and aordably! Advertise, market and promote your business in the most popular, most read edition of the year! For more information, rates and deadlines call (910) 484-6200 RESERVE YOUR SPACE TODAY!

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Up & Coming Weekly - June 18, 2019