Up & Coming Weekly

April 02, 2019

Up and Coming Weekly is a weekly publication in Fayetteville, NC and Fort Bragg, NC area offering local news, views, arts, entertainment and community event and business information.

Issue link: http://www.epageflip.net/i/1099870

Contents of this Issue


Page 9 of 36

WWW.UPANDCOMINGWEEKLY.COM APRIL 3-9, 2019 UCW 9 The push for 'Medicare for All' is thought deprivation in full view by KARL MERRITT OPINION Over a (just concluded) series of three columns, I contended that thought deprivation has taken a foothold in America. e series examined seven steps employed by power-seeking politicians, and others driven by the same aim, to develop and sustain thought deprivation among people living in America. "Living in America" is used here instead of "American citizens" because the effort even reaches out to noncitizens and illegal migrants. Each col- umn opened with the following statement: "ere is a dangerous, but tremendously effective, political approach employed in America. It could be called 'thought deprivation.' It's conditioning people so they do not think with depth regarding the issues that face us as a nation. Sadly, allow- ing this thought deprivation approach to become routine and embedded in the political process has brought us to a point of real danger in the governing, and very survival, of this nation." Many actions that should reasonably be tak- en are not taken. Other actions are taken that adversely impact the well-being of Americans. Finally, gridlock is a frequent consequence of this political approach; nothing is done re- garding important matters affecting the people of our country. Examples abound that show how thought de- privation plays out, and so negatively, in American political processes. Among the many examples is what is happening as "Medicare for All" is being discussed and considered in our country. What is presented here is not an argument for or against such a program; it is instead a limited examination of how little depth of thought is be- ing given to this proposal that could dramatical- ly affect American residents for years to come. Let's start the examination with how little residents know about Medicare for All. is from an article by Katie Mahoney titled "'Medicare for All' isn't the Health Care Reform Americans Want, Poll Finds." "Many Americans don't understand what Medi- care for All is, and when they do, they don't like it, a Morning Consult poll commissioned by the U.S. Chamber found. "e poll found only four-in-ten (41%) knew much about Medicare for All. When asked, most voters believe it is a system that ensures that all Americans have access to health care services and insurance through a mix of private health care and government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.' "Fewer than one-in-five voters polled could identify it as 'a government-run health care system, financed by taxpayers that provides essential health care to all Americans and eliminates private health insurance plans, including those provided by employers. When asked if they support just such a program, only 44% supported the idea." A reasonable question is, how can it be that people know very little about Medicare for All? One reason is that most media have joined forces with the effort to develop and sustain thought deprivation. ey simply do not aim to explain issues in detail, and coverage is, most often, slanted to support a particu- lar position regarding an issue. I watch a lot of news and commentary. It disgusts me that most offerings are very short, timewise, on a topic and almost totally devoid of serious, honest analysis of facts. Possibly more disturbing is that politicians and others involved in seeking to gain and hold power are even guiltier of the failing ascribed to media in the preceding paragraph. Any time I hear a mem- ber of this group give a straight answer to a ques- tion that calls for actually informing the electorate, I am surprised beyond description. A case-in-point came when the following hap- pened during an interview of presidential candi- date Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., as reported in an article by Grace Sparks titled "Majority favor 'Medi- care for All,' but with a catch." "Harris spoke in Iowa on Monday about embrac- ing Medicare for All, even though in most instances it means eliminating private insurance. When pressed by CNN's Jake Tapper on whether that means eliminating private insurance, the senator from California answered affirmatively, saying she would be OK with cutting insurers out of the mix." Note that Harris had to be pressed for an answer, but did, in fact, answer. is kind of avoidance by power-seekers results in the public allowing govern- mental actions that do not serve the best interest of, or show fairness toward, all Americans. However, the approach survives and is far too suc- cessful because there is deprivation of thought. One would also think that cost should be a pressing question from the public in reference to Medicare for All. In that regard, consider the following from an arti- cle by Jennifer Earl titled "How much would 'Medicare for All' cost? Democrats' health care plan explained." "Several independent studies have estimated that government spending on health care would increase dramatically, in the range of about $25 trillion to $35 trillion or more over a 10-year period. Specifically, a study released over the summer by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University estimated it would cost $32.6 trillion — $3.26 trillion per year — over 10 years. For comparison, the federal budget proposal for the fiscal year 2019 was $4.4 trillion, the Congressional Budget Office states. "Sanders blasted the Mercatus Center's analysis as 'grossly misleading and biased.' "'If every major country on earth can guarantee health care to all, and achieve better health out- comes while spending substantially less per capita than we do, it is absurd for anyone to suggest that the United States cannot do the same,' Sanders replied, arguing on his website that his plan would cost about $1.38 trillion per year. 'is grossly misleading and biased report is the Koch brothers' response to the growing support in our country for a Medicare for all program.'" Sen. Bernie Sanders' response assumes that America would do a program similar to the other countries, to which he makes a general refer- ence. My research indicates what he and others seem to be proposing is not done by any of the countries viewed as somewhat successful in as- suring health care for all citizens. I hold it is very safe to say that nobody has a good idea as to what Medicare for All would cost. It even appears there is not consensus on what the program would offer or how it would work. However, it is a fact that taxes would increase for some American citizens. Interestingly, support for the concept is strong— that is, until people get informed. e following information, from Kaiser Family Foun- dation Tracking Poll, conducted Jan. 9-14, 2019, appears in an article by Jane Sarasohn-Kahn titled "Americans Are Warming to Universal Health Care, Kaiser Poll Finds": "Would you favor or oppose a national Medi- care for All plan if you heard that it would do the following? "Guarantee health insurance as a right for all Americans — 71% favor/27% oppose "Eliminate all health insurance premiums and reduce out-of-pocket health care costs for most Americans — 67% favor/30% oppose "Eliminate private health insurance companies — 37% favor/58% oppose "Require most Americans to pay more in taxes — 37% favor/60% oppose "reaten the current Medicare program — 32% favor/60% oppose "Lead to delays in people getting some medical tests and treatments — 26% favor/70% oppose." As people get more informed regarding Medicare for All, or any issue of importance, interest elevates, and critical thinking happens. is is not an outcome that serves the aims of power-seekers well. ought deprivation is, there- fore, a primary strategy. In general, we permit the deprivation to work. It results in and allows for manipulation of citi- zens — of how they vote, of what they protest, of what they demand or expect from government and so forth. If we in America do not immediately break free of imposed thought deprivation, not only will current generations suffer harsh consequences. We will impose insurmountable challenges on generations yet unborn. Is Medicare-for-all right for America? Do Americans understand what Medicare-for-all entails? Most do not. KARL MERRITT, Columnist. COM- MENTS? Editor@upandcomingweekly. com. 910-484-6200.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Up & Coming Weekly - April 02, 2019